- hank, hitler, and obama

October 7, 2011

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/03/hank-williams-compares-obama-to-hitler_n_992513.html

I’m not a fan of Hank Williams, Jr.  Other than the theme to Monday Night Football, I couldn’t tell you one of his songs, not even by accident.  I’m quite sure his political leanings are the exact opposite of mine.  Other than beer, football, and facial hair, I likely have absolutely nothing in common with him.  If he disappeared tomorrow, I likely wouldn’t know it, ever.  While I’m positive there is probably nothing about him that I would like, I’m equally positive that there was nothing wrong with the comment he made recently on the television show Fox and Friends that caused him to be tossed aside by ESPN.

The hosts of the show asked him how he felt about a recent event in which President Obama, Joltin’ Joe Biden, and House Speaker and Republican Senator John Boehner were playing golf together.  Williams, seeming especially annoyed by that topic, was asked how he felt about it.  He said, “It’d be like Hitler playing golf with (Israeli Prime Minister) Netanyahu.”

Although the comparison is not very accurate, it is also not offensive, although the media would have you think otherwise because…well…they want it to be in order to have a story.  Williams wanted to portray Obama and Boehner as being polar opposites.  He chose two historical figures who would also be polar opposites, and that’s all there was to it.  It’s not a good comparison because, given the chance, both Hitler and Netanyahu would literally kill each other.  Obama and Boehner not only would not literally murder the other, but they also are not really opposites.  They both the same goal, but they would prefer to reach that goal in very different ways.

And since when did the name Hitler become something like Lord Voldemort that he now is “He who must not be named”?  It’s not wrong to talk about Hitler, unless you’re supporting his ideas as progressive and positive.  Williams did not directly compare Obama to Hitler, although he did call him “the enemy,” but that’s because he was going for polar opposites, and Obama is opposite Williams and Boehner, and also opposite Fox and Friends.  That venue also needs to be addressed in this because the hosts acted shocked, suggesting that Williams had said something horribly wrong.  For the Fox hosts to criticize Williams for attacking Obama is about the same as a bartender inviting you into his bar and then criticizing you for having a drink.

The only solace in this is in the ending.  As ESPN announced that they had suspended Williams for a week and a decision was pending on what further action would be taken, I was expecting Williams to apologize and sit down with Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson or Joan Rivers or Jackie Mason.  Instead, Williams stood up for himself and basically told ESPN to “take this job and shove it.”  He rightly said that his First Amendment rights were being violated and that they were no longer allowed to use his song anymore.  I guess now there’s something I like about Hank Williams, Jr.


- really? “obama’s katrina”?

June 2, 2010

 

Pundits and “fair and balanced” newspeople need to stop blaming President Obama for the BP oil spill.  Do you really believe that something Obama has or has not done either caused or is making the spill worse?  Do  you really expect Obama to be an oil expert with full knowledge on how to cap, contain, and clean up the situation?  Of course not.  That’s why he has a cabinet of people empowered with either the knowledge of what to do and/or the resources to find out what to do.  Beyond that, what about the oil industry’s responsibility? 

If my home is heated with oil, and I have an oil tank beneath my home, is it the mayor’s job to know how to clean it up?  Of course not.  It’s MY job, as owner of the house, to either clean it up or pay someone to do what I am not capable of doing.  What is the mayor’s job is to make sure I’ve cleaned it up and paid any necessary reparations to restore the land to what is was before the spill.

Let’s also stop referring to the spill as “Obama’s Katrina” because there’s a very big difference.  Although President Bush did not and could not cause the death and destruction brought by Hurricane Katrina, he did make a few mistakes in public relations, band-aids, and over-estimation.  Hurricane Katrina was on the way, giving people time to prepare and evacuate.  Bush could not force people to evacuate, nor could he provide protection from the coming storm.  However, just like 9/11, he could have taken the forecast more seriously instead of waving a hand and dismissing the potential.  After the storm, Bush basically flew over Louisiana, waved, and dropped in to tell everyone what a good job “Brownie” (ex-FEMA head Michael Brown) was doing.  Afterward, when the real damage was coming to light, he threw cash cards and trailers at the homeless and hoped they would go away.

Did Obama have a forecast on the oil spill?  Did anyone hand the President a report warning of the likely failure of the oil rig and a projection on the environmental damage?  Did he have a chance to take action before the danger occurred? 

I don’t recall that, but feel free to educate me if i missed something.


election thought 2 – nothing to fear but old white guys

September 3, 2008

terrorism is based on – surprise! – terror. fear.

back in 1933, franklin d. roosevelt, an excellent president, said, “the only thing we have to fear is fear itself — nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror…”

however, the republicans want you to be afraid. their speeches at this convention are all about security, 9/11, the military, the war on terror, the enemy that wants to come here and blow us up, etc. they want you to believe that obama will allow the terrorists to waltz into the country, but mccain will round up the posse and head ‘em off at the pass.

the want you to be afraid because a fearful citizen is an obedient citizen who will cower in the corner while the rough, tough sheriff rides into town to save the day.

a few months back, president bush criticized obama for saying that he’d have a dialogue with our enemies. bush likened that comment to what might have happened if we tried to have friendly chat with hitler back before world war II. what bush is too dumb to realize is that communicating with your enemy is a good thing. why do you think the police have hostage negotiators? so we can talk, find out what’s wrong, what can be done, and what can’t be done. just because obama wants to talk to the enemy doesn’t mean he wants to give them his car keys and wallet.

i’m tired of the fear messages. mccain said that he’ll keep the military in iraq for 100 years if necessary. now that’s something to be afraid of.

and why is it that the republicans seem to be mostly old, rich, white guys?


election thought 1 – obama v. mccain

August 29, 2008

i’m politically independent, not declared to either party because either side can and has had both very good and bad presidents. to automatically adhere to a candidate just because they are affiliated with a particular party is robotic, thoughtless, and silly.

i try to approach each candidate as an individual person and evaluate their core beliefs by comparing them to mine. for example, if i’m pro-choice and one candidate is but the other is not, then that’s a plus for the first guy. i’m not claiming to have broken new thought-ground; i just want to explain how i work.

up to this point, all i have heard from senator mccain are reason not to vote for senator obama. more important than what mccain has said is what he has not said. if i’m going to vote for mccain, he’s got to say, “vote for me because i’m going to do this, this, and this, and these things will improve your life because of that, that, and that.” but hasn’t said anything of the kind. all i have heard from him is that i should not vote for obama because he’s inexperienced and will make it easier for the terrorists to come here and get us all as we sleep.

those fear-mongering arguements are silly and likely will be counter productive to anyone who made it to high school. and now that he’s tagged the governor of alaska, a woman with only about two years of experience in public service, he just lost some ammo. how can mccain tell us not to vote obama because of his lack of experience when his v.p. choice has only a fraction of the political career of obama?

this is a desperation move because he’s trying to grab the “hillary” vote. he knows he’s got no chance, so he’s hoping, just hoping.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 833 other followers

%d bloggers like this: