- bang goes the gavel

December 18, 2011

 

I average about 20 hits on my blog each day.  Compared to most that I read, 20 is nothing.  On a recent day I had 52, so I wondered what might have happened.  The only other time I had that many in one day was when I wrote something not very flattering about the town of Haddonfield, NJ, and it spread amongst the snooty residents quickly and unhappily.  I supposed just this statement alone might rekindle that, but probably not.

The recent 52 might have coincided with something else though: the day after my ex-wife was served with papers showing that I am trying to get my daughter to come and live with me.

What’s the connection?  First, I know that her lawyer hates me, so he was probably scouring my blog looking for information he could use against me.  Maybe statements, blog entries, such as the one in which I said that marijuana should be legalized, so he could use that to convince a judge that I’m not fit to be a custodial parent.  Of course my answer would be, “If you really think I’m not fit to take care of my kid, then why did you wait until now to pursue that angle?  Why have you let me spend time with my kid thus far and only now, while I’m trying to get more time, you’re claiming I’m unfit?”

The judge sent a letter to my and my ex-wife’s attorney’s asking each of us the same question:  why do you deserve what you want, and why should the other not get what they want?  That seems pretty simple, but it also seems like he wants us to do his job for him.  My ex claims that in a judgement from a few years ago I agreed not to seek any more increases in parenting time with my kids.  She’s not wrong, on paper.  However, where she IS wrong is that, logistically, I’M not seeking more time.  My daughter is.

What some people fail to recognize is the wants, needs, and pursuits of the children.  My daughter has asked for years to spend more time with me, but her mother has always maintained two things:  1. “of course, Rose.  Just tell me when you want to see your Dad, and we’ll work that out.”  and 2. “No, Rose, it’s just not a good day for you to go see your Dad.”

My kid is brave.  She’s standing up to her mother, knowing fully well that her mother can be tough.  The kid has been yelled at, cursed at, had tv remotes and chairs thrown in her direction, been mislead, swindled, and just plain lied to.  I don’t know how she maintains the toughness to keep going, but I’m damn lucky she’s doing it.

Several seasoned lawyers have all agreed that even if you have the most perfect and logical argument entirely spelled out for the court,  you’re still at the mercy of whatever mood the judge is in on that day.  I’ve seen it happen – I think.

I’ve been before judges about five times in my life.  Not once has it worked out in my favor.  However, this is probably the most important of them all.


- the second amendment

April 3, 2011

Article the Second

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

I’m not against guns.

I’m against idiots with guns.

I’m not against the right for citizens to own and keep guns.

I’m against citizens owning and keeping guns like AK-47’s that have only one purpose: to kill as many people as possible in as little time as possible.

I’m not against gun ownership.

I’m against irresponsible gun ownership, such as the people who allow children to get hold of loaded weapons to the tune of 500 kids killed a year through gun accidents, not including homicide or suicide.

I don’t argue with the idea that “guns don’t kill.  People kill.”

I do argue that it’s a lot harder to kill someone without a gun.

All that being said, let’s look at the long-standing disagreement about the interpretation of the fourth amendment, which reads above:

A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

For those who support the NRA and love to play paintball so you can play “war” like we did in 5th grade, yes, I see the words that read  the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.  Those words seem to indicate that our founding fathers wanted average citizens to keep themselves armed and ready.  But why?  Just…because?  Not so.

You can’t ignore the first half, which reads A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State.  The first half of the fourth amendment clearly, I repeat, clearly shows that the purpose of “the people to keep and bear arms” is to have a militia.  It also clearly states that the purpose of the militia is for the security of a free state.  That doesn’t mean security against the guy who you think might possibly rob you in the Harrah’s Casino parking lot.  It means security in case this “free state” is attacked by another “state.”  Free or not.

If it makes you feel cool or powerful to own a gun, great, good luck.  But at least keep it locked and safe.  And at least get one that’s not designed to kill a small village in about four seconds.

Am I asking too much?


- chicken vs. egg – part 3

February 26, 2011

Time magazine, February 21, 2011

 “In a British study of children and nutrition, kids who ate a healthy diet (lots of fruits, veggies, rice and pasta) at age 3 had higher IQ’s at age 8 ½ than kids who ate meals made up of a lot of fats, sugars, and processed foods.  The average difference was slight – less than two IQ points – but that can add up.  Disturbingly, improving the kids’ diets after age 3 could boost their overall health, but it didn’t change their intelligence scores.”

 and this is a mystery?  when are we going to learn the single most important item, most important factor, most important word that affects who, what, where, how, and why our children will be – PARENTS.

kids of a high IQ ate good food and became smart kids.  and we’re going to think it was the food that made them smart?  noooo.  it was the parents.  and it was the parents who decided to give the kids the good food.  why?  because they’re good parents.  good parents give kids good food.  good parents also give kids a good upbringing and a better chance at being smart and successful.

bad parents aren’t as smart.  bad parents don’t know the right foods to give their kids.  bad parents eat crappy foods, and they give their kids crappy foods.  why?  because they don’t know better. 

when the kids with low IQ’s started out eating bad foods, but later they changed to good foods, their health improved but not their IQ.  really?  that’s a mystery?  if you bought a crappy present but wrapped it really nicely, does that make it a better present?  no f-ing way.


- what i’ve learned, so far, about parenting

February 25, 2011

i’ve notice a handful of books in recent years from celebrities and television personalities, non-fiction books that are like a tribute to the father from the son.  i would imagine that any father who has a son so motivated to write about about him must be a great dad.  however, some dads are so tough with their sons that those sons spend a lifetime fighting for approval.  probably the most famous example would be howard stern, who has admitted thousands of times that his entire show is basically a way of proving to his father that he’s not an idiot.

although i’ll never be famous enough to write a book about my father, i can still recognize and admit that i learned a lot from him.  most of it was good, but some of what i learned was what can be called “what not to do.”

Be tough with your kids, but also be there when they need you.

Make sure they understand the difference between “earning” something and “being given” something.

Be ready for hardship, but be ready to have fun.

No matter what you do, I’ll be there to pat you on the back, and I’ll be there to grab you by the neck.

Sweating is good for you.

Put on some pants because I’m turning down the heat to save a few bucks.

If you join a team, you stick with it until the end of the season.  You don’t quit after a few losses.

Homework, then TV.

What Mom doesn’t know, Dad might.  What Dad doesn’t know, Mom will.

If you can’t say “sorry” when you did something, then don’t try using “please” when you want something.

Not every dinner tastes great, but every dinner will be healthy.

Just because I can give you what you want, doesn’t mean that I will.

Never accept the answer, “Because I said so.”

Sports are important, but they’re not worth fighting about.

 If your teacher says you did it, then you’re guilty until proven innocent.

 If your brother or sister says you did it, you’re innocent until proven guilty.

 If your report card says you did it, well, you did it.

 I won’t always have all the answers, but I’ll always do everything possible to find the ones I don’t have.


- to be competetive

December 30, 2010

It once meant something when you “made the team.”  You went to try-outs, struggled through practice, had a number pinned on your shirt as you caught passes or fly balls.  You stood in front of judges and “nailed it” as best you could, but that “best” doesn’t seem to mean anything anymore.  I know that self-esteem is important for a child, but so is accomplishment.  By allowing everyone to make the team, it no longer means anything to make the team.

In a town I won’t name there’s a high school cheerleading squad with thirty girls, thirty teenage girls with cell phones and a desire to talk trash about anyone else as soon as one of them walks away.  It’s a MySpace disaster waiting to happen.  Thirty girls is fifteen too many, but the coach isn’t allowed to hold tryouts or cut anyone because everyone is too worried about the self-esteem of the girls who don’t make the squad.  However, because they are all guaranteed a spot, they hold no value for it.  If the coach isn’t allowed to cut anyone, even for poor behavior, they’re going to behave like brats, like when some of the girls refused to cheer because they didn’t like what the coach was telling them to do.  When the coach finally did attempt to kick a girl off the team, girl’s mother sent threatening e-mails to the coach, athletic director, and principal.  With each e-mail, the coach offered to meet with and talk to the parents in person, but each time they refused and sent more threatening e-mails until finally the school administration put the girl back on the team and reprimanded the coach, all because the cheerleader had suffered “irreparable harm to her self esteem.”  If a coach slaps my kid, yeah, I want an apology and a reprimand.  But if my kid is breaking team rules, then I want my kid reprimanded instead.  Schools are giving too much power to parents because it also gives too much power to the kids. 

If it’s not cheerleaders, it’s football, basketball, or anything else that involves a team.  Did I say “team”?  Oh, I forgot, we don’t have “teams” anymore.  We have collections of individuals all out to improve their stats and their chances of a scholarship.  This is why parents hold their kids back from what should be their first year of kindergarten, so they’ll be a year older, bigger, faster, stronger, and (maybe) smarter than the rest of the class.  Then they’ll stand out more on the field, on the court, in the classroom, and (maybe) on the SAT and college applications. 

We all want our kids to succeed, but at what cost?  Is it worth it for your kid to be at the top of the class when they’re really in the wrong class?  If that’s what it takes to get a top college scholarship, well maybe so, even though you’re kind of cheating against younger kids.  It’s kind of like putting an 8th grader in gym class against 7th graders.  It may seem like only one year, but it’s also 12% of their educational life.  And what do you say to your kid when he or she is about to be a high school senior, and they figure out that they really should have graduated the previous year?  Maybe they’ll think it’s worth it because of the rewards, but maybe they’ll be a little upset if they think that you’ve cheated them out of a year of their life.


- A Different Deadbeat Dad

August 29, 2010

 

See this man?  I don’t know him, but I don’t like him either.

For several hours, for several days, I watched him do two things:  read newspapers and ignore his kid.  For several days I watched his son, a sprightly, energetic boy of about 9, dig in the sand and run left and right, to and fro (whatever they are) with a football on the beach as his father either read a newspaper or napped in a beach chair.  The boy tossed a football in the real air while imaginary football players, presumably on the other team, tried to tackle him.  All while his father sat his ass in a chair doing nothing other than read and sleep.

It took great restraint for me to not go to the boy and say, “Hey, throw.  Let’s play catch.”  All while his dad caught nothing but Z’s.  I was afraid that someone would find it weird for a 40-something guy to approach a 9-something boy to play.  It may have seemed like the right thing to do, but it wasn’t worth the risk. 

I know a dad is entitled to his vacation too, and if he wants to read, he’s allowed to read.  But it’s not difficult to find reading time on vacation.  Play with the kid, tire him out, and read while he falls asleep in front of the television or goes to bed early.  Parents are entitled to many things, but kids are entitled to more.  They didn’t ask to be born, and if you didn’t want or plan to have a kid, then give him up to one of thousands who would die for the chance to be a parent.

My father didn’t do everything right.  He wasn’t capable, didn’t know everything, and did what he knew.  I can’t fault him for that, even though I know way more without knowing why I know way more.  He never hugged me said he loved me, but he was there at 12:30 in the morning in 33-degree rain when I got out of work and my car wouldn’t start.  He was under the hood while I feebly aimed the flashlight like an AV geek and he replaced spark plugs or cleaned a carburetor.  He was in the street playing football with me and my friends while other dads were raking over the books and receipts.  He knelt in the street with a piece of chalk and showed me how to run a button hook, a down-and-out, or a fly, flag, or post pattern.  My friends thought he was the greatest dad ever, but I was convinced they were way off, falling for the “show” dad.  Sometimes they were right, sometimes wrong.  I didn’t know it at the time, but compared to the dads I see today, my friends were way more right than wrong.


kids today

December 13, 2008

As I drive to work each morning from 6:30 to 8, I pass various residential settings. Along Atlantic County Road 575 there is a pair of trailer parks with half a dozen kids standing curbside, if there is a curb, as the school bus approaches. A similar group of children, a range of ages, stands in the driveway of an inexpensive motel on state highway 322, likely a location at which the state sets up as low-income housing during the non-summer season. Before I get to those places, I pass two suburban developments and a stretch of farmland.

First come the McMansions of the developments with once-clever outdoorsy names like “Deer Run,” “Dillon’s Creek,”and “Waterstone.” Announced by gold-lettered signs, the entrances of those subdivisions are clogged with SUV’s and crossovers, engines idling and spitting a stream of carbon monoxide into the precious atmosphere. Inside sit silent parents listening to an AM news station as the children are plugged into their Ipods and listen to collections of sounds that they believe are actually songs. September to June, regardless of downpour or wondrous and warm sunrise, these children are sheltered both physically and emotionally by their loyal parents until the bus comes rolling along.

A mile down the road is a gravel path that leads to a farmhouse partially hidden by the early growth of next year’s “live and cut Christmas trees.” Each morning, six or seven high-school kids stand where the rocks meet the road and watch for the same school bus that had been waiting for the other kids to crawl out of Mom or Dad’s SUV. The farm kids are different. They’re not plugged into ipods, and their parents aren’t driving back up to the house with the kids’ empty coffee cups. The farm kids talk. They interact. They play “catch” with hacky sacks. When it rains, they get wet. When it’s cold, they bundle up. When there’s something beautiful on the horizon, they see it.

They also see life. They see work, and they deal with problems, maybe feeling the residual, “trickle-down effects” of a poor economy while the kids up the road will still get Mom’s credit card and BMW to drive to the mall at will. The farm kids might get to college, and if they do, they’ll hustle out of class to get to their part-time jobs, the same jobs they have now in high school. They’ll learn life skills like how to please the boss, be on time, and get along with co-workers whom they don’t like. The kids up the road will only go into a workplace if it’s the one their parents own. They’ll deal with college as more of a social opportunity and annoyance than an education. They’ll step into jobs, careers really, but they won’t have the drive that will have developed in the farm kids who actually worked hard but were never actually certain that they would get there.

I don’t know with whom I have an issue to take up. It’s hard to blame the McMansion kids because they don’t set the conditions, not at first anyway. They’re a product of their environment, and they’re what they have been taught and raised to be. One of the very few times my brother, a staunch Republican, has ever agreed with me was when I said, “I don’t want to hear parents complain that ‘kids are different these days.’ Kids are what we have allowed them to become. They are born no different than we were, but they’re raised much differently than we were.” Should I take issue with the parents who spend too much coddling time instead of quality time? On Friday night they leave a handful of $20’s on the kitchen table with a note that says “See you Monday,” then after work they head for the shore house or Atlantic City condo while the kids are home with the house to themselves all weekend. The parents are the ones who give the teenagers the new Lexus for Christmas their senior year and send them to the Caribbean after graduation, ruining a lifetime of expectation and entitlement.

Or maybe my issue is with myself.


birth order

November 27, 2007

i recently read a story in time magazine that discussed birth order. it covered the same old arguements and asked why the oldest child is usually the greatest achiever in a family and the younger the siblings, the lesser the accomplishments in life as a whole.

i’m not disagreeing with the results, but i am disagreeing with the suggested causes, of which the article named very few causes. but here’s the only one you need to be aware of.

fact: the oldest and/or older children in a family usually out perform the younger ones.

fact: parents give the maximum amount of time and attention to the older or oldest child because subsequent children have no choice but to share time and attention with each other.

who wants cake?


no such thing as ADD or ADHD

April 13, 2006
there is no such thing as ADD or ADHD, and don’t let anyone tell you differently. if you ask a school psychologist if there is a physiological test that indicates this “disorder,” and if you ask for a simple yes or no answer, you’ll hear “no.”
yes, there are children who demonstrate behaviors such as a short attention span, inability to stay at one task for a sufficient length of time, being easily bored with school. sure this happens. and yes, there is a chemical imbalance that is the likely reason – but the real question is, “what has caused this imbalance?” here’s what parents do not want to hear about – Sometimes – not always of course – it is the parents that are the cause.
from birth until pre-school, ADD and ADHD are being created by parents. not all situations and cases, of course. here’s how: they take the kids, sit them in a room with a bunch of toys strewn about, put a tv on that shows either PBS (sesame street, tele-tubbies, etc.), and they leave the kid there all day while the parent is on the phone, on the computer, having coffee and cigarettes with friends, anything other than paying attention to the child. and what does the kid do during this time? glances at the tv, maybe watches for a minute when there is singing or loud noise. pick up a toy, bite it, bounce it. they can’t really figure out what to do with a plastic boat at 9 months, so they drop it and move on to the soft plastic picture book. they don’t know what those things are, so they drop that too. they basically move from one thing to the next, getting bored easily, and not really paying attention to anything for very long.
doesn’t that seem exactly like the ADD and ADHD kids in school? and where did they learn these behaviors? right, at home. and where did the parents learn these child-raising habits? from their parents. and this is why people think ADD and ADHD are hereditary, because it seems to be passed down to each generation. but that’s not what’s passes down. it’s the style of parenting that’s passed down, not a genetic illness or disorder.
now these kids go to school and disrupt the class because they are behaving exactly the way they were trained during those early years. and to stop them, we give them drugs that do not at all address the real problem. instead, the drugs just slow the kids down and makes them zombies. they don’t act out as much, but they won’t make it out of the building very quickly during a fire either.
what’s the real brain issue? what’s this about a chemical imbalance? yes, it’s true, there is one. there are brain connections that are created in infants and toddlers when someone sits down with them, reads to them, talks to them, plays games with them, and laughs with them. and when the kids get older, it’s helpful when the parent takes out ONE toy, plays with it, has the child help to put it away, and then takes out another toy. one at a time, not just a mess of colorful plastic everywhere. and these are the behaviors we want our children to demonstrate in school. drugs won’t do that. only parenting will. and the ADD and ADHD kids do not have those brain connections, but that doesn’t mean they can’t still GET them, even in teen years. the right interaction between parents and children can still create those connections and it can still produce those needed chemicals all during elementary and middle school, possibly high school as well.
when i was a middle school baseball coach, i had a great second baseman – sometimes.  it depended on when he took his medication.  before, he was alert, ready, good glove, quick feet.  after, a steady breeze would have knocked him over.  he fell asleep in the dugout.  when his father asked me why he wasn’t playing, i said, “because i don’t want him to take a line drive to the face.”  the kid was good, but not when taking his ritalin or whatever it was.
it only takes time and attention – and those are two of the very few things that money can not buy. drugs? sure, money has that covered.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 813 other followers

%d bloggers like this: